C13 · Reference edition 2026.11
Intensity scales — Comparison and alternatives
A scale needs labelled anchors and a defined observation context. An unlabelled number cannot be compared reliably across records.
Scope and purpose
Compare alternatives using the same question and context. A difference in wording, layout or scale is not automatically a difference in performance. Keep the original observations available and explain which differences are meaningful for this comparison.
Working notes
This atlas connects descriptive vocabulary, observation context and reference-sheet design. All example records are synthetic and exist to explain a method of documentation; they do not represent tested batches, product ratings or scientific results. The diagrams are original editorial graphics. Descriptions of perceived character are kept separate from ingredient, origin, health and certification claims. Read definitions and scale anchors before comparing records.
Practical example
Attach the same written low and high anchors to every example using the scale.
| Reference record | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| C13 | Intensity scales |
| Scope and purpose | A scale needs labelled anchors and a defined observation context. An unlabelled number cannot be compared reliably across records. |
| Limits and interpretation | Do not compare values produced with different anchors as if they were equivalent. |
Review checklist
State the comparison question; align context and labels; list common features separately from differences; leave unsupported conclusions open.