C08 · Reference edition 2026.11
Aroma and taste — Comparison and alternatives
Aroma and taste are different observation channels. Their timing and conditions should be stated rather than merged into one unqualified score.
Scope and purpose
Compare alternatives using the same question and context. A difference in wording, layout or scale is not automatically a difference in performance. Keep the original observations available and explain which differences are meaningful for this comparison.
Working notes
This atlas connects descriptive vocabulary, observation context and reference-sheet design. All example records are synthetic and exist to explain a method of documentation; they do not represent tested batches, product ratings or scientific results. The diagrams are original editorial graphics. Descriptions of perceived character are kept separate from ingredient, origin, health and certification claims. Read definitions and scale anchors before comparing records.
Practical example
Use separate rows for orthonasal aroma, in-mouth impression and aftertaste.
| Reference record | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| C08 | Aroma and taste |
| Scope and purpose | Aroma and taste are different observation channels. Their timing and conditions should be stated rather than merged into one unqualified score. |
| Limits and interpretation | The reference vocabulary is not a diagnostic or a food-safety assessment. |
Review checklist
State the comparison question; align context and labels; list common features separately from differences; leave unsupported conclusions open.